X
Advance Search
  • Yu, B. K., Tian, P. H., Xue, X. H., Scott, C. J., Ye, H. L., Wu, J. F., Yi, W., Chen, T. D., and Dou, X. K. (2025). Comparative analysis of empirical and deep learning models for ionospheric sporadic E layer prediction. Earth Planet. Phys., 9(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.26464/epp2024048
    Citation: Yu, B. K., Tian, P. H., Xue, X. H., Scott, C. J., Ye, H. L., Wu, J. F., Yi, W., Chen, T. D., and Dou, X. K. (2025). Comparative analysis of empirical and deep learning models for ionospheric sporadic E layer prediction. Earth Planet. Phys., 9(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.26464/epp2024048
Open Access    

Comparative analysis of empirical and deep learning models for ionospheric sporadic E layer prediction

  • Sporadic E (Es) layers in the ionosphere are characterized by intense plasma irregularities in the E region at altitudes of 90–130 km. Because they can significantly influence radio communications and navigation systems, accurate forecasting of Es layers is crucial for ensuring the precision and dependability of navigation satellite systems. In this study, we present Es predictions made by an empirical model and by a deep learning model, and analyze their differences comprehensively by comparing the model predictions to satellite RO measurements and ground-based ionosonde observations. The deep learning model exhibited significantly better performance, as indicated by its high coefficient of correlation (r = 0.87) with RO observations and predictions, than did the empirical model (r = 0.53). This study highlights the importance of integrating artificial intelligence technology into ionosphere modelling generally, and into predicting Es layer occurrences and characteristics, in particular.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return